That is that healthcare/ medicines which are prescribed should be properly tested.

I think we would, in the main, want that wouldn't we?
So, to get a medicine/therapy approved costs thousands of pounds. So who funds this?

Not your government, until pressure is put on them and they are not
showing any signs of funding research.

Funding is done by private companies. They spend thousands on research but they won't spend money on research if the patient group is not big enough.

No, despite patients almost begging them to do so.
And they won't spend money if a therapy/medicine will not make any money at all.

So, as a consequence of that funding system, thousands of very promising medicines/therapies will not get looked at, no matter how good or how promising they appear to be, because you can get them easily and cheaply.

Your doctor is not a researcher. He can barely keep up with patient demands

He is told what to prescribe in the main, despite wanting to prescribe different therapies/medicines.

The consequence to you, dear reader, is that you will only hear about certain money-making therapies from your doctor.

He dare not mention much else in case he gets sued.

Other consequences run like this. Because no one had told you about preventative medicine, you may live a certain way that unknowingly had direct consequences to your health.

Perhaps you had not been told about regular detoxes, for instance, and as a result, toxins had built up in you to such an extent that cancer was the outcome.

Thus you were only recommended certain drugs which were not very effective and you lost your lung, severely restricting what you could do for the rest of your life.

All because no one would fund research into promising therapies and thus you won't hear about things like Dr Bob Beck's or Dr Raymond Rife's protocols/machines and other therapies.

Things like this happen every single day in this country.
There are certain health principles which, if applied, will prevent you getting all manor of serious complaints, including cancer.

So study well those principles on preventative medicine. The cost of not applying them can be dire indeed.

I am in touch with a few researchers/GPs and have some interesting stories.

A GP recommended a patient who he was getting nowhere with, to see a certain therapist.

The consequence to his patient is that she improved very well.
But he said if this got out, other members of his practice may sack him.

Another researcher found that taking the measles mumps and rubella jabs was massively more effective than altogether was told.

So, the answer, dear reader, comes from all of our pressure and more pressure is to be placed upon the government to get/fund independent research and publish the results for all to see.

It will take massive pressure from us to force them to do this and there are a lot of people out there who would not want this.

As a pointer to those interested in health, look into the works of Dr Bob Beck, Dr Raymond Rife, Harry Edwards, and Dr Usui Serrapeptase on the power of regular detoxes.

Proper nutrition is something that I feel GPs in this country get a pittance of training on.

Oxygen therapies, massage, acid/alkaline balance, food combining, castor oil and peanut oil and its uses also fall into this category.

Phil Brookman
Shepshed
Leicester