Amber Valley Borough Council tight-lipped on Belper River Gardens tea rooms future

The old tearooms at Belper River Gardens
The old tearooms at Belper River Gardens

Amber Valley Borough Council will not reveal how many responses it received to its tender for a replacement Swiss Tea Rooms in Belper River Gardens – which could cost £290,000.

Funding for the project was committed in March and in June, after a three-month delay for further scrutiny, the authority put out a tender to find a company to design and build the new facility.

Belper has been waiting for a replacement tea room for nearly 40 years.

The council said that any design would have to be in keeping with the heritage setting of the current site and that it could cost up to £290,000 after an assessment from a specialist catering consultant.

This search for a contractor was due to finish in September, but nearly a month later, the authority will still not reveal how many companies, if any, showed interest in the scheme.

A spokesperson for the authority said: “The council won’t release information that pertains to a tender process, whilst the process is ongoing, as this is regarded as confidential information.”

The project has been bankrolled through £190,000 from the borough council, and Belper Town Council, which has previously committed up to £100,000. The Belper Tea Rooms Association has also been fundraising for a replacement through its “Buy-a-Brick” campaign through which members of the public can donate funds to buy a virtual brick.

There has been a “catering operation” in Belper River Gardens since 1905. However, in 1982 the cafe closed and the building in which it operated from has now fallen into disrepair and is currently derelict.

Independent firm AD Catering Consultants assessed the proposals for a new Swiss Tea Rooms earlier this year.

It recommended that instead of a cafe, the replacement for the tea rooms should be a kiosk with a kitchenette with some internal seating.

It stated that the proposals put forward by the the tea rooms association were “incorrect”, and “need refining”.

Combating this, the association said: “We do not feel that the ADC report justifies a change in direction” and that “we would not object to AVBC making a larger capital contribution of course”.

It also said that: “ADC have not considered the wider benefits of having an attractive tearoom building in Belper River Gardens. These include additional revenues to AVBC from business rates and parking, economic benefits for the area, the value to the World Heritage Site and wider community benefits including the very important potential for promoting the Gardens for people with disabilities.”